Springfield
Downtown Streets Conversion Study
The Clark County-Springfield
Transportation Coordinating Committee (CCSTCC) is conducting a
feasibility study to convert several downtown Springfield streets from
1-way to 2-way traffic.
The goal of the Springfield
Downtown Street Conversion Study is to improve the economic
competitiveness and mobility throughout downtown Springfield by
recommending a “complete” street system that improves multimodal
interaction, way finding, walk ability, and quality of life, while
maintaining acceptable parking and traffic operations. The study
deliverable will be a document that outlines transportation concerns,
impacts and trade offs, livability and walk ability issues, potential
economic benefits, costs and a record of public involvement. The study
process will include Public participation from residents, property
owners, the business community as well as agency coordination is
important to the success of this study if the final implementation plan
is going to be comprehensive and offer benefits to all types of users.

The
Public Involvement Plan for the Springfield Downtown Street Conversion
Study offers the Public ways to:
-
Learn about the study's purpose, the project needs, the planning
process, and the importance of public involvement,
-
Provide input to identify potential issues and prioritize study
objectives,
-
Gain information on the study's progress,
-
Learn about the potential impacts and benefits of each alternative
under consideration, and
-
Give input toward selection of a recommended alternative solution.
Public Meetings
Two public meetings were held
throughout the course of the study. The first public meeting solicited input from the public for the purpose and need document and red
flag summary for the study. It also introduced the public to the
study process and established goals for the study in relation to traffic
operations, livability and walk ability downtown. The second meeting
presented to the public the alternative solutions and solicit
feedback.
Survey Results
Data Exhibits
For questions regarding the data below, please contact Lamar Daniel.
Did You Know - Facts regarding the Springfield Downtown Streets
Conversion Study
Walking Audit Findings
Traffic
Modeling
Traffic
modeling was performed for this study to allow the study team to
evaluate the current traffic conditions, expected traffic conditions if
no streets are converted to two-way, and expected traffic conditions
under three scenarios of street conversions. Current models from the
Ohio Department of Transportation were used and refined for this use.
These models dynamically estimate new traffic patterns given a set of
street changes. The models also account for changes in land use and
development (i.e. the proposed hospital).
Under current
conditions, the downtown area has plenty of capacity during peak hours
and does not experience significant delays. In the AM peak hour, the
analysis shows that all of the intersections are at 55% capacity or
less. The PM peak hour analysis shows the worst intersection, W. North
Street at N. Yellow Springs Street, to be at 62.5% capacity.
Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume
The 2030 Base
model (no conversions) incorporates expected changes in land use and the
street network by 2030. This included the new hospital north of North
Street between N. Plum Street and N. Wittenberg Street and the resulting
roadway changes, and other population and employment changes expected in
the downtown. The modeling shows that the system would still operate
efficiently in the future. However, growth, primarily the proposed
hospital, does have a noticeable impact on future traffic operations. In
both the AM and PM peak hour, the worst intersection delays are
consistently along N. Spring Street. The worst intersection capacity is
operating at less than 70%, which is acceptable from a traffic
operations perspective.
Traffic Volumes and Intersection Capacity Utilization - AM Peak Hour
base
Traffic Volumes and Intersection Capacity Utilization - PM Peak Hour
base
Three
alternative networks that include conversions of streets from one-way to
two-way were then modeled. They are:
Alternative 1 Conceptual Layout
Alternative 2 Conceptual Layout
Alternative 3 Conceptual Layout
For each alternative,
traffic redistributed itself to minimize delay in the system. The
intersection level analysis for each alternative still shows that the
system operates efficiently with only slightly increased delay at
certain intersections. For all the three alternatives, the worst
intersection capacity is operating at less than 100%, resulting in
acceptable traffic operations throughout the modeled area. For
comparison purposes, the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), Vehicle Hours
Traveled (VHT), and Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) from the traffic models
were compared; and statistically there is no significant difference
between any of the modeled networks.
Alternative 1 - AM Peak Hour
Alternative 1 - PM Peak Hour
Alternative 2 - AM Peak Hour
Alternative 2 - PM Peak Hour
Alternative 3 - AM Peak Hour
Alternative 3 - PM Peak Hour
Overall, each
of the alternatives affects the downtown roadway system in a different
way but does not cause an overloading of that system. In each case, the
intersection delays, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle hours traveled, and
vehicle hours of delay remain fairly consistent with the Base model run.
Under the alternative configurations, there is still enough intersection
capacity. This allows the traffic to re-distribute in the most efficient
manner. Any of these alternatives, as well as the Base, will work for
the City of Springfield from a traffic operations standpoint.
Alternative Evaluation Matrix
Study Presentation - shown during the public meeting on February
15, 2011.
Study Handout
Study Questionnaire
Recommended Alternative
After reviewing all the public
comments submitted, Alternative 1 (convert all one-way streets) was
selected as a recommended alternative.
Springfield Downtown
Streets Conversion Study Report
Executive Summary (138 kb)
The full report can be found in the Reports
Library.
For additional information regarding this study, please contact Lamar
Daniel at (937) 521-2131.
|